Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelbird

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:08, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Angelbird

Angelbird (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source searches, including custom searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Some of the company's products may be notable, but not finding much coverage about the company itself. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delet Fails GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. I agree that some of the products may be notable but there are no intellectually in-depth references on the company itself. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 20:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c)  21:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Much about the products, little about the company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. My name continues to not be dave (talk) 17:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Not wanting to pile on but not wanted it to be relisted. Ifnord (talk) 18:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
• Delete pile on, I know, but for clearer consensus. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.