timesync.jp Timesync.jp

   
TIMESYNC | タイムハック

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Timesync.jp?

• Timesync.jp ranks #496,012 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Timesync.jp?

3.72E-5% of global Internet users visit Timesync.jp

How many people visit Timesync.jp each day?

• Timesync.jp receives approximately 1.8K visitors and 7,817 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Timesync.jp receive most of its visitors from?

• Timesync.jp is mostly visited by people located in Japan.

How much Timesync.jp can earn?

• Timesync.jp should earn about $2.81/day from advertising revenue.

What is Timesync.jp estimated value?

• Estimated value of Timesync.jp is $2,965.62.

What IP addresses does Timesync.jp resolve to?

• Timesync.jp resolves to the IP addresses 157.7.44.236.

Where are Timesync.jp servers located in?

• Timesync.jp has servers located in Japan.

timesync.jp Profile

Title:TIMESYNC | タイムハック
Category:Sports / Running

What technologies does timesync.jp use?

These are the technologies used at timesync.jp. timesync.jp has a total of 1 technologies installed in 1 different categories.

timesync.jp Traffic Analysis

Timesync.jp is ranked #496,012 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1.8K visitors daily, generating a total of 7.8K pageviews. This equates to about 55.6K monthly visitors. Timesync.jp traffic has increased by 63.21% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.8K
25.94%
Monthly Visits55.6K
63.21%
Pages per Visit4.26
59.21%
Visit duration03:36
75.85%
Bounce Rate48.30%
264.04%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,836
Monthly Visits:
55,631
Pages per Visit:
4.26
Daily Pageviews:
7,817
Avg. visit duration:
03:36
Bounce rate:
48.30%
Global Reach:
3.72E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
23,833
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
16,878
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
53,994
HypeRank:
496,012
SimilarWeb Rank:
496,012
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
80.33%
Referral:
19.67%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
19.67%
Mobile:
80.33%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

74.8K
DEC
34.1K
JAN
55.6K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Japan 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to timesync.jp?

Websites similar to timesync.jp are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 1 min ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 24 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with timesync.jp in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
9,010

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  timesync.jp
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $2.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $84.3 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $3K.

How much would timesync.jp make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.81
Monthly Revenue:
$84.30
Yearly Revenue:
$1,025.65
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Japan 7,817$2.81

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.08
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$2.53
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$30.81
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
235
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
7,035
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
85,596

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Japan 235$0.08

How much is timesync.jp worth?

Website Value:
$3K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
timesync.jp
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
timesync.jp
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
timesync.jp
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is timesync.jp hosted?

Timesync.jp may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does timesync.jp load?

The average loading time of timesync.jp is 502 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
502 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)338ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)514ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)22ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)529ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)338ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)514ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)22ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)529ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Time to Interactive 0.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 0.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)448ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)702ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)80ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)709ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)448ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)702ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)80ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)709ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 90 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 1.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Speed Index 2.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Does timesync.jp use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on timesync.jp are reduced by 29%.
timesync.jp use gzip compression.
Original size: 823 B
Compressed size: 579 B
File reduced by: 244 B (29%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. timesync.jp supports HTTPS.
 timesync.jp supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: timesync.jp
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Jan 12 15:25:43 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 12 15:25:42 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 timesync.jp supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 15:19:24 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 579
server: Apache
last-modified: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:28:46 GMT
accept-ranges: none
vary: Range,Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 2560
Mname dns0.heteml.jp
Rname hostmaster.timesync.jp
Serial Number 1743948496
Refresh 16384
Retry 2048
Expire 1048576
Minimum TTL 2560
TXT v=spf1 include:_spf.heteml.jp ~all 3600
MX mx.hetemail.jp 3600
A 157.7.44.236 1748
NS dns1.heteml.jp 86347
NS dns0.heteml.jp 86347

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on November 5, 2013 and will expire on November 30, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar . The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 18, 2025.
Domain Created:
2013-11-05
Domain Expires:
2025-11-30
Domain Updated:
2025-03-18
Domain Age:
11 years 5 months 1 days
Domain Owner:
TIMEHACKS INC.
WhoIs:
 

[ JPRS database provides information on network administration. Its use is    ]
[ restricted to network administration purposes. For further information,     ]
[ use 'whois -h whois.jprs.jp help'. To suppress Japanese output, add'/e'     ]
[ at the end of command, e.g. 'whois -h whois.jprs.jp ***/e'.                 ]
Domain Information:
[Domain Name]                   TIMESYNC.JP

[Registrant]                    TIMEHACKS INC.

[Name Server]                   dns0.heteml.jp
[Name Server]                   dns1.heteml.jp
[Signing Key]                   

[Created on]                    2013/11/05
[Expires on]                    2025/11/30
[Status]                        Active
[Last Updated]                  2025/03/18 15:13:31 (JST)

Contact Information:
[Name]                          GMO Pepabo, Inc.
[Email]                         email
[Web Page]                      http://muumuu-domain.com/?mode=whois-policy
[Postal code]                   810-0001
[Postal Address]                Tenjin Prime 8F, 2-7-21, Tenjin
                                Chuo-ku, Fukuoka-City, Fukuoka
                                8100001,Japan
[Phone]                         092-713-7999
[Fax]                           092-713-7944